The economic depression indicator meter.

Depression indicator meter: Updated March 20th 2008





The index is at -37
When the index is at -200 we are in a great depression.

Index rises to -37
5/2/2008 Slight rise in GDP and unemployment number goes down.
4/14/2008 Corporate profits edging down, along with consumer confidence.
4/03/2008 Unemployment rises slightly as 80,000 lose jobs.
3/26/2008 Durable goods drop and consumer confidence drops again.
3/24/2008  Index rises to -35 from -37. Sales of pre-existing homes unexpectedly rise.
3/20/2008 Update due to manufacturing index falling for a fifth straight month.

The meter indicates how likely we are to enter a recession, depression, or to experience economic growth.  The meter is based on 20 economic factors.  Some of these factors change (The Sub-Prime mortgage crisis).  They are weighted based on their level and trend during previous recessions, and the great depression.
Currently GDP is growing ever so slightly, international trade is up, and U.S. exports are up.  The average hours worked is stable and bank credit, despite the recent sub-prime woes appears to be somewhat stable. These offset the other factors, almost all of which are down. As new information is updated (unemployment figures, the stock market, interest rates, etc.) the needle moves.

Current indicators

Housing crisis
Stock market
Fed posture
Unemployment rate
Price of Oil
Price of Gold
Consumer confidence
Banks failing
New housing starts
Quarterly services
Manufacturing shipments/orders
GDP
Business investment
Productivity
Consumer credit
International trade
Bank credit (Total commercial)
Inflation
Average weekly hours worked
corporate profits


My Zimbio
Top Stories

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 8/30/2008 5:58 PM GeneM wrote:
    How credible is an index whose parameters are specified but with no algorithm for how they are used? Science will only credit discoveries that can be independently verified. Even trade secrets must be shown to independent sources sworn to confidentiality before you can raise venture capital. So where does this claim leave us? Unsatisfied, I would say.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.